<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Travelblog &#187; rigid airlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.travelblog.co.za/tag/rigid-airlines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.travelblog.co.za</link>
	<description>Where travel is blogged</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:48:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Inflexibility  costing you money?</title>
		<link>http://www.travelblog.co.za/travel/inflexibility-costing-you-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.travelblog.co.za/travel/inflexibility-costing-you-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costing money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rigid airlines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.travelblog.co.za/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inflexibility costing you money? The main aim of the article is with the airlines, is their inflexibility and inability to handle and deal with isolated instances from a business and a clients perspective, this is after all your bread and butter on the business side and your clients over and above more important than that. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Inflexibility costing you money? The main aim of the article is with the airlines, is their inflexibility and inability to handle and deal with isolated instances from a business and a clients perspective, this is after all your bread and butter on the business side and your clients over and above more important than that. Let me ask a question to both travel agents and to clients? How many times have you booked a ticket to find that you need to reroute or do a date change and the rules on the ticket are so rigid taht this is not feasible. In fact often it is better to cancel the ticket and by a new one. Here are some examples I have encountered in the past few weeks:</p>
<ul>
<li style="text-align: justify;">Johannesburg to Miami one way via Atlanta on Delta &#8211; the client need to do a reroute ie fly to Houston &#8211; reroute was permitted however as there was no availability to book JNB-ATL-Houston , there was however availability if I booked Atlanta Houston &#8211; so what I needed was for the married segments to be broken so I could use JHB to Atlanta and the new portion to Houston &#8211; ie collect the reissue fee and keep the passenger on Delta &#8211; well nope the could not assist &#8211; only option &#8211; cancel ticket and sell on a carrier that could assist for that date and routing.</li>
<li style="text-align: justify;">Kulula Lumpur return in Business class &#8211; client needed to fly a day earlier and the only option was to reroute via Singapore &#8211; keep the validating carrier as Air Malaysia and reissue the ticket with the change fee. This is a R40 000 ticket. Response from Air Malaysia &#8211; No &#8211; no reroute prior to departure! No problem hand ticket in for a refund and sell the ticket on Singapore airways. So now you get R1000 cancellation fee instead of a R40 000 booking.</li>
</ul>
<p>These are just two recent examples I have encountered which leads me to raise the question is your own inflexibility costing you money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.travelblog.co.za/travel/inflexibility-costing-you-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

